SpiralTruth

Just another post-modern quest for meaning.

Why self promotion sucks…

My current band has had what I think are several radio-worthy tracks for a couple of years and I still haven’t sent a CD into the local radio station. Why? Sure, we’ve just been distributing the tracks online and don’t have an actual CD yet, but even the Amish know how to burn a CD these days. (Actually, I don’t know that, but wikipedia tells me that the Amish actually aren’t quite the luddites we usually assume they are, so I’m betting I could find at least one.) And I’ve bugged plenty of radio station folks in my last band, eventually getting radio play for tracks that I think are far less worthy than these. So what’s the hang up?

It’s hard to explain it to someone who hasn’t done the whole self promotion thing for years, but those of you who have, successful or not, have got to agree that it sucks. If I could scrub toilet bowls in exchange for someone spending the equivalent amount of time promoting me, I’d say, “Sign me up!” And I think I might have to fight more than a few other struggling artists for the privilege.

What’s so bad about it? Do I not believe in myself enough? Not enough self confidence? Well, not really. I’ve seen many a band make it with less talent. And I’ve seen many musicians more talented than me not going anywhere either. Call it low confidence if you will, but there’s more than a little luck involved… and obviously being able to promote yourself can swing the odds in your favor.

Well, the thing is, I just don’t know how to do it without looking like an asshole. Who out there has had to write up a press kit bio for themselves? Does a part of you not cringe at all of the accolades you bestow upon yourself? “I’m really not that vain, but I know anyone who knows me will think I am if they knew I wrote this!” Or the infamous query letter that attempts to convince a publisher that I’m the next Steinbeck. After all, they’d say, why should they waste their time with a mediocre writer?

The artists that I really look up to are the ones who think they’re not that great, the ones who are still trying to live up to their idols. I can’t imagine one of these folks promoting themselves in the way that conventional wisdom seems to suggest. I have a secret suspicion that any humble artist who makes it does so because someone else gets tired of them not promoting themselves and decides to do it for them. Because if you really think you’re the hot shit that people who are going to give you those lucky breaks want to believe you are… then you’re probably just an asshole.

And if you really care about what you’re doing, the last thing you want to do is feel like an asshole about it.

21st Century Art: Opportunity… or nihilism?

I’ve always been rather serious about art. It’s more about obsession than fun and it often carries the burden and the zeal of a religion. There’s this notion that all the mistakes I’ve ever made, anything I might consider foolish or shameful, is somehow made right by creating something that transcends myself – something that somehow taps into the universal and eternal. I love the way art can turn ugliness into beauty and bring order to what can seem so cruel and random. The flip side of this is a constant dissatisfaction with whatever I create and a feeling of almost frantic discomfort when I don’t feel I’ve created enough.

How much is enough? I don’t know. I’ve written and recorded over sixty songs, finished a novel, designed the websites I use to promote all of this and… that just doesn’t seem like much after having done it. What I do think a lot about is whether I’ll write another song or book and whether they’ll be any good. Or about how I haven’t worked hard enough to market what I have created. Marketing has always seemed like a dark art to me. I’d rather not have to understand it but I know how important it is. Especially now. We’re at this amazing period in human history where everyone has a voice. Never before has the ability to have your ideas reach millions of people been so democratized. The problem now, of course, is how to be heard over the chatter. And anyone looking to do that also has to ask themselves whether or not they deserve to be heard.

(more…)

Changing directions…

When I was in high school, I had an English teacher that was very much against the use of “I” in writing. Perhaps because he seemed so sure of himself and I was so unsure of myself, that advice sort of stuck in my head, and I suppose it’s good advice when you’re writing high school essays. In hindsight, I think another high school English teacher gave me something much more valuable when he taught me to hate clichés. Sometimes I still use them because, overused or not, they’re the best say something, but I still hate them and agonize over them. But the “I” thing did a little more harm than good. It instilled this Catholic-like guilt in me, admonishing me to take myself out of my writing in order for it to be more persuasive. It’s also a very journalistic way of looking at the world. Journalists feel they are doing their job better by taking themselves out of the story. The problem is, it’s never true. No matter how objective a piece of writing sounds, it is always written by someone. I think that’s why I like Hunter S. Thompson so much. He saw through all that and decided to go out of his way to be in the news he was reporting. (more…)

Confirmation: Curtis Cook and the CBoC

Michael Geist gave confirmation today that he did indeed contact Curtis Cook to verify his statement. This assumes, of course, that he would delete a comment on his blog that was claiming to be him if it wasn’t him, which is a fairly reasonable assumption. With his reputation for being rather meticulous when it comes to looking at new copyright legislation, it would be surprising if he did not verify a source as important as Cook. I’m still left a bit disappointed that more people weren’t asking for clarification on this. Yes you could interpret his original post in a way that suggested that he had verified Cook’s identity, but the interaction between Geist and Cook was still hazy, relegated to three words in the blog post: “with his permission”, which still could have meant that it was simply the permission of whoever it was who posted the comment, not necessarily Cook. Now, however, that aspect of the story is clear. More traditional news sources are also starting to pick this up. I don’t believe we should necessarily give traditional news sources any more authority than blogs these days (both are apt to make major mistakes from time to time), but with a greater variety of sources comes a greater variety of research methods, and one would hope that, collectively, any poorly researched aspects of the story would be weeded out.

Now that we can reasonably assume the truthfulness of this development, we can now load the heaps of scorn on the Conference Board of Canada that it deserves.

Nietzsche would have something to say about being careful when fighting monsters…

A week ago, I found myself writing a snarky email to Gillian Shaw about her article on the Conference Board of Canada’s “research findings” on the strength of Canadian copyright. I’m a huge fan of BoingBoing and Michael Geist, and I had been following their reporting on this quite closely. I’m going to put up the content of that email not because I’m especially proud of it (I consider it, more or less, to be giving in to a very seductive form of righteousness that myself and my fellow lefties like to indulge from time to time), but to show how much of “a believer” I was and am in a less-is-more approach to copyright reform. And I’m doing that to give you an idea of how much I did not want to get into the conversation I got into today regarding the latest allegations against the Conference Board of Canada, post fuck up. (And to be clear, they did fuck up. I just think we’re jumping the gun a bit as to how much they fucked up). On with the email, then…
(more…)

Art in Science, Science in Art

TED just posted a fascinating clip from 2002 where Mae Jemison talks about the relationship between the arts and sciences. As someone who is at heart an artist, but who chose to study science in university, I’ve always been painfully aware of the communication barriers between the two worlds. To the artist, science is often too cold and calculating to be any fun. To the scientist, art can be subjective to the point of being irrelevant. Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance made a case for seeing art and science as complimentary ways of approaching life over thirty years ago, but I think Jemison states their relationship even more eloquently in this video, saying: “Science provides an understanding of a universal experience and art provides a universal understanding of a personal experience.” Now the only problem is convincing universities and high schools to teach this way…

Record Industry Catalyzes its Own Destruction

Around 12 AM last night, Cory Doctorow of BoingBoing got pointed to a major fuck up and wrote about it. That fuck up was owned by none other than Warner Music Group, and since there are about a bazillion blogs on the Internet, Warner would normally have had nothing to worry about. Except that probably everyone who has written a blog post knows of Cory Doctorow. He’s like that kid in the back of the class that never stopped pestering the teacher with questions. You didn’t like him growing up, but then maybe you got to that age where you started doubting your own infallible wisdom just a bit, and you realized how easy it is to compromise between your ideals and “the way it is”. Love him or hate him, you have to admit that turning pissing contests with authority into a business model at the peak of an age where the Corporation has almost complete dominion over us is a pretty decent achievement. It was sort of like watching David and Goliath and knowing how the story ends while you’re watching it unfold. I wouldn’t be surprised if this was hardly mentioned by the mainstream media outlets, but everyone who really matters in terms of the future of the music industry already knows. (more…)

Happy April 20th ;-). Journalist succumbs to burning cannabis!

How the e-book will change us… for real this time.

Steven Johnson of The Wall Street Journal posted this article today on how the e-book might fundamentally change the process of reading and writing (therefore changing us). I disagree that Amazon’s Kindle will be what brings e-books mass acceptance. It reminds me of a BlackBerry. Too clunky and ugly. Plus there’s the DRM issue which will hopefully go the way of iTunes DRM. Remember, e-books have been around in one form or another for a while now and have so far managed to be far from revolutionary. That said, once you can combine a DRM-free Amazon with a better e-reader, like the one being developed by Plastic Logic (still not the ideal e-reader, in my opinion, but getting close), then I think we just might start seeing people carrying their libraries around with them… but, as Johnson suggests, it will be more than that:

Think of it as a permanent, global book club. As you read, you will know that at any given moment, a conversation is available about the paragraph or even sentence you are reading. Nobody will read alone anymore. Reading books will go from being a fundamentally private activity — a direct exchange between author and reader — to a community event, with every isolated paragraph the launching pad for a conversation with strangers around the world.

(more…)

Little Secrets

I was noticing a lot of images floating around the web that shared a common theme. They either were or looked like a post card, and they had some sort of secret hope or fear or memory written on them. A couple of days ago, I finally decided to track down the source. Of course, in the age of Google, tracking down the source hardly ever amounts to more than an hour of dedicated searching. The only difficulty with these images was that they didn’t contain any sort of brand logo… only a certain style. In addition, the images I had been looking at had no sort of attribution made by the person who had uploaded them (tsk, tsk!) After typing in a few of the secrets, I eventually found a link to one of the images, which mentioned “Post Secret” and voila! I had found the source. Kind of.

Frank Warren had the idea back in 2003 to ask a bunch of strangers to send him their deepest, darkest secrets. Turns out, a lot of people have some pretty interesting secrets. Enough for Frank to be swamped with postcards and have enough material to pump out five books (that I know of) to date. I now have four of them on order. Here’s a sample of what I’m talking about:




(more…)

Harnessing Lightning via Electrolysis and a New Patent System

The world’s in a very strange place right now. On one hand, it feels like it might fall apart at any moment. Worldwide economic collapse, global warming, the always turbulent Middle East. On the other hand, everything seems possible. We’re starting to program DNA, we can engage in worldwide collaboration on any subject, and the U.S. has elected a smart President who believes in science. Wow. Maybe that’s why I ended up musing about alternative energy today. I was thinking about lightning. We’ve known for a long time that a single lightning strike could provide amazing amounts of electricity if we could only harness it. The main problem is that all the electricity is delivered at once. We could never charge a battery fast enough to store it. Meanwhile, hydrogen is a promising fuel source. You can get it from water and you get water as the exhaust when you burn it. The main problem with hydrogen is that you have to use so much energy to separate it from water via any of the known methods (electrolysis being one of them). Well then, wouldn’t it be possible to set up a system that uses a lightning strike to help convert a bunch of water into hydrogen, effectively using the gas as a very volatile quick-charge battery? You’d have to keep the hydrogen from exploding, of course. And there might be something about a lightning strike that makes it fundamentally unsuitable for the task. I’m much more passionate about art than I am about traditional science, and I have to confess that I have no desire to try and build a proof of concept. I did, however, find the idea intriguing enough to whip out the google-fu and see if anyone else had asked a similar question. Turns out, a lot of people had. Some of them are even trying to make a working prototype. Check out these links: (more…)

Awesome New Guitar Technology!

I’m in love with the Dark Fire guitar from Gibson. It auto tunes to any preset tuning in under a second. That alone is enough to push it to drool-worthy status. It’s also optimized for the world of digital recording. The price is a bit hefty, but I wonder if this signals a new era in music technology. Perhaps the last few die hards have finally let go of the mystique of analog. The economy may be on life support, but this is proof that there are still some folks out there creating some pretty cool stuff. If only we could just trade the bankers and auto execs for more of them.

Pavement Picasso

Julian Beever knows how to give you vertigo while walking down the street. Check out his surreal chalk pavement drawings and see if you don’t agree. Believe it or not, these do not involve any modifications to the pavement beyond coloring it with chalk. Any sense of depth on the sidewalk itself comes from Julian’s own strange mind. I’ve always been fascinated with street artists. I’ve always seen permanence as being an important incentive for an artist to create. When I write a story or a song, I’m recording something I think is important, and even if I may never be able to quit my day job, that pseudo-immortality is enough to encourage me to continue to create in my spare time. But someone who makes a beautiful chalk drawing knows it’s going to get walked on and rained on and eventually ruined. He knows that, but he still does it. Sure Beever and others can catalog their work with a camera, but past snapshots, they have only memories of their art. It’s a very brave way to create. If you want a bit of insight into the process he goes through, check out the video of him doing his Aveeno Fountain of Youth drawing in New York:

Chris Cornell Collaborates with Fan

Here’s something cool I just noticed on Chris Cornell’s site. You can hear the song on his site. The lyrics are written by one of his fans, Rory Dela Rosa. Now before everyone gets too jealous about how cool it must have been to write a song with one of rock’s most talented singer/songwriter’s, you should know something about Rory. In April, he lost his six year old daughter to cancer and then he got handed his own cancer death sentence a few months later. As much as I dig Chris’ stuff, I’d take life over collaboration in a heartbeat. Unfortunately, Rory doesn’t have the choice.

One of the coolest things about being an artist is that you get to record parts of you that will live on past your physical death. I’d say the belief I have in that is the closest thing I’ve ever had to a religion. It’s no small comfort to know that people will have your poetic best to remember you by. Hat’s off to Chris Cornell for taking the time and helping to make something beautiful out of such awful circumstances.

Toy Revolution: Computerized Blocks

My generation played with Lego, and we’re currently in the driver’s seat of Web 2.0. I wonder what kind of revolution that the kids who get to play with Siftables will start.

p.s. I want some!

To CEOs: It’s Better Than the Guillotine

I thought this article was pretty hilarious. That’s right… Wall street CEOs completely fuck up the economy. Then, as they’re asking for tax payer bailout money, they do things like spend $87,000 on an area rug. And when the common folk get a bit upset they say, hey, wait a minute… we have to spend ridiculous amounts of money just to fit in.

What these guys don’t understand is how good they’ve still got it, even on their poverty level allowance of $500K/year. Yes, ladies and gentlemen, it’s time for a history lesson…

Another cause was the fact that Louis XV fought many wars, bringing France to the verge of bankruptcy, and Louis XVI supported the colonists during the American Revolution, exacerbating the precarious financial condition of the government

The inefficient and antiquated financial system was unable to manage the national debt, something which was both caused and exacerbated by the burden of a grossly inequitable system of taxation. Another cause was the continued conspicuous consumption of the noble class, especially the court of Louis XVI and Marie-Antoinette at Versailles, despite the financial burden on the populace. High unemployment and high bread prices caused more money to be spent on food and less in other areas of the economy.

Sound familiar? That was the French Revolution. You can read all about it in the wikipedia article.

Remember what else happened during the French Revolution?

The common people didn’t cut the noble elite’s salaries, they introduced them to the guillotine.

In times like these, we should all try to be thankful for what we’ve got. And hey, if you’re a CEO on Wall Street and you still have your head, you’re doing a hell of a lot better than your predecessors.

Republicans, you need to start being original…

Check out the following video and see if you get any feelings of deja vu…

Now, forget for a moment about the guy caressing his shotgun and the other guy claiming that the Democrats are the root of all evil in the world. Also, forget about the scene where the latter suggests that Republicans are the only ones who allow him to say what he wants to say without fear of going to jail (perhaps it’s because he’s a white male traditional family values sort of guy that he’s never had to worry about saying anything too controversial).

Take that ridiculousness out and what are you left with? You got it. President Obama’s election winning message. It’s as if all the Rush Limbaugh fans (who could never hope to have an original thought) got together and did an awkward tribute video for Barack Obama. Gotta make sure you include lots of regular working class people. Throw out the fear mongering of the Bush years and talk about change and hope. Talk about how the little guy’s getting screwed. Talk about freedom to do what you want to do and the government listening to the middle class for a change.

So that’s how they’re going to rebuild their party? By parroting the stuff that worked for the Democrats and hoping everyone will forget the last eight years? It’s like a guy who beats his wife and then tells her, “Baby, ain’t no one gonna love you like I do.” Ha! All the while, images of Ronald Reagan float from scene to scene as if he was their Messiah and they’re waiting for him to rise again! Somehow, I just can’t buy that the guy who brought us the Iran contra scandal would be able to start turning water into wine.

In case you guys haven’t noticed, YOUR FEARLESS LEADER got us into this cluster fuck of an economy. How about holding off rebuilding the party that made it possible for such a complete dumb ass to lead the free world into disaster for just a few months and pitch in. You guys love talking about patriotism, right? Well wouldn’t that involve lending a hand to the guy trying to fix things? He’s not going to get everything right, but he’s trying, damn it, and you’re being a bunch of twits about it because he’s trying something different. Do you really think he wants to fail? Of course not. That means you share the same goal. Because the Democrats are in charge now and you’re not, they’re going to try a different strategy. You’re just going to have to deal with that. Now it’s your chance to be a sober voice of opposition, to point out specific flaws in any of their proposals and get them fixed. That, or you can keep pouting and let them claim all the credit for any progress that is made.

The Publishing Odyssey IV: Reject!

This is what a rejection letter looks like:

Thank you for your query. I regret I have to pass on many interesting projects due to time constraints. I urge you to query widely of course!

It’s pretty simple, and you can see how it’s been honed through the years to be inhuman enough to discourage you from trying to persuade the person afterwords – which would, of course, necessitate a much harsher shut-down. It feels a lot like a date gone horribly wrong. You know that it’s not really about time constraints. If they really liked you, they’d find a way to fit you in. And you sort of want to know where you went wrong. What can I do so this doesn’t happen again? But you don’t want to be one of those jerks who just won’t take a hint. So you suck it up and try to figure it out on your own. Or you could take the other extreme and rant about how dumb this person was to not recognize such genius! That’s what Gerard Jones does on his site, www.everyonewhosanyone.com. (more…)

Woody Norris – Advice to Inventors

I watched Woody Norris do a fascinating talk on TED last night. He’s invented a device that focuses sound like a laser focuses light. Speakers are messy. They send the signal out to anyone near the speaker. Woody’s device effectively “beams” the sound to whoever it’s pointed at. So yes, if you start hearing voices in your head, you might not need to call the psychiatrist just yet…

After watching this, I found an interview with Woody Norris on Makezine that I thought was interesting. In particular, I found his advice on patents interesting:

I think a lot of inventors are paranoid about sharing their work for fear that it will be stolen. This is a near pathological problem among inventors. File a patent and get over it. You can file a provisional patent with an attorney for $1,000, or you can do it yourself for $80 if you can’t afford an attorney. Then you can talk about it. Expose it. If you are not willing to do this, you don’t really believe in your invention–you are just kidding yourself. I have never had a company steal one of my inventions in over 40 years of doing this; companies are scared to death of being sued. So do your work, get your patent, and then sell it. Stop making excuses.

The patent system can be downright ridiculous and I think it needs major reform. However, Woody Norris talks about it here in a way that reminds us of its purpose: to encourage inventors to publish good ideas by offering them a legal entitlement to receive compensation when others use those ideas. I wonder if start-ups like Cambrian House might end up eventually replacing the patent system. They solve exactly the same problem in a way that seems much more responsive and fair.

How to Write a Book

Steven Johnson wrote a great post about how to write a book on BoingBoing today. I like how he gives himself a lot of time to play with ideas and how he manages that play with Devonthink. I think maximizing creativity isn’t necessarily about putting more effort into thinking creatively as it is about properly handling and recording the flashes of insight that we all have. Having a wide range of tools at your disposal, and especially having one or two that you can access often, will go a long way in allowing creative moments to be properly managed, perhaps avoiding the much feared disease that is writer’s block. I wish I had had a system like this when I started writing. I think the entire process could have been a lot easier than it turned out to be.

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin