<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How the e-book will change us&#8230; for real this time.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spiraltruth.com/2009/04/how-the-e-book-will-change-us-for-real-this-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spiraltruth.com/2009/04/how-the-e-book-will-change-us-for-real-this-time/</link>
	<description>Just another post-modern quest for meaning.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:39:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Jurmu</title>
		<link>http://www.spiraltruth.com/2009/04/how-the-e-book-will-change-us-for-real-this-time/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Jurmu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 19:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spiraltruth.com/2009/04/how-the-e-book-will-change-us-for-real-this-time/#comment-89</guid>
		<description>David, is that picture of the Kindle 2?  The buttons appear to be in the wrong places.  The dimensions are still essentially the same, but the new release is significantly improved over the first. (Enough so, anyway, for O&#039;Reilly to &lt;a href=&quot;http://toc.oreilly.com/2009/04/over-160-oreilly-books-now-in-kindle-store-without-drm-more-on-the-way.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;start selling their previously open-.mobi ebooks&lt;/a&gt; in the Kindle Store without DRM.)  Even so, I still like the look of the Plastic Logic reader better, and Sony&#039;s PRS-700 remains the sexiest of the lot.

Ebooks have received strange print press over the past two weeks.  First, this article in the &lt;i&gt;WSJ&lt;/i&gt; that takes a gee-whiz approach to matters that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shirky.com/weblog/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;are&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://toc.oreilly.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;constantly&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.readerville.com/index.php/blog/view/ebook-dreams-from-days-of-yore/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;exhaustively&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://booksquare.com/google-book-search-and-reader-privacy-a-consideration-and-call-to-action/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;discussed&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://thedigitalist.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;online&lt;/a&gt;, usually absent from the writing of someone that embraces brevity (like Walter Mossberg, ostensibly the &lt;i&gt;WSJ&lt;/i&gt;&#039;s tech columnist), and then this past week a bizarre article in the &lt;i&gt;New York Times&lt;/i&gt;&#039; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/26/fashion/26kindle.html?_r=2&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Fashion &amp; Style&lt;/a&gt; section.  An excerpt from the latter: &quot;And as books migrate from paper, it means the death of the pickup line, &#039;Oh, I see you&#039;re reading the latest (insert highbrow title here).&#039;&quot;

When I read the above quote, I quickly checked the page header to make sure I was still reading the &lt;i&gt;Times&lt;/i&gt; and hadn&#039;t been bumped to some other site.  I completely understand that, to many, ereaders fall on aesthetic, and not utilitarian (at least not until they actually fork over the money for one), concerns, but the rest of the &lt;i&gt;Times&lt;/i&gt;&#039; article is about as informative about either as that quote.  Joe Wikert over at &lt;a href=&quot;http://kindleville.blogspot.com/2009/04/new-york-times-laments-forward-progress.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Kindleville&lt;/a&gt; had a good time carving a jack-o-lantern out of the expressed sentiments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, is that picture of the Kindle 2?  The buttons appear to be in the wrong places.  The dimensions are still essentially the same, but the new release is significantly improved over the first. (Enough so, anyway, for O&#8217;Reilly to <a href="http://toc.oreilly.com/2009/04/over-160-oreilly-books-now-in-kindle-store-without-drm-more-on-the-way.html" rel="nofollow">start selling their previously open-.mobi ebooks</a> in the Kindle Store without DRM.)  Even so, I still like the look of the Plastic Logic reader better, and Sony&#8217;s PRS-700 remains the sexiest of the lot.</p>
<p>Ebooks have received strange print press over the past two weeks.  First, this article in the <i>WSJ</i> that takes a gee-whiz approach to matters that <a href="http://www.shirky.com/weblog/" rel="nofollow">are</a> <a href="http://toc.oreilly.com" rel="nofollow">constantly</a> and <a href="http://www.readerville.com/index.php/blog/view/ebook-dreams-from-days-of-yore/" rel="nofollow">exhaustively</a> <a href="http://booksquare.com/google-book-search-and-reader-privacy-a-consideration-and-call-to-action/" rel="nofollow">discussed</a> <a href="http://thedigitalist.net/" rel="nofollow">online</a>, usually absent from the writing of someone that embraces brevity (like Walter Mossberg, ostensibly the <i>WSJ</i>&#8217;s tech columnist), and then this past week a bizarre article in the <i>New York Times</i>&#8216; <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/26/fashion/26kindle.html?_r=2" rel="nofollow">Fashion &amp; Style</a> section.  An excerpt from the latter: &#8220;And as books migrate from paper, it means the death of the pickup line, &#8216;Oh, I see you&#8217;re reading the latest (insert highbrow title here).&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>When I read the above quote, I quickly checked the page header to make sure I was still reading the <i>Times</i> and hadn&#8217;t been bumped to some other site.  I completely understand that, to many, ereaders fall on aesthetic, and not utilitarian (at least not until they actually fork over the money for one), concerns, but the rest of the <i>Times</i>&#8216; article is about as informative about either as that quote.  Joe Wikert over at <a href="http://kindleville.blogspot.com/2009/04/new-york-times-laments-forward-progress.html" rel="nofollow">Kindleville</a> had a good time carving a jack-o-lantern out of the expressed sentiments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
